Some feedback to be included in comments on the CCTV Policy - Please if any member has comments they would like to propose email [email protected] - It is a policy, not a by-law or law, therefore not enforceable and thus confusing. - The policy itself should be restructured to specifically address CCTV on OM, public and private properties. It is currently mixed and not definitive. - It currently states all CCTV must be registered with OM, even private and OM should have access and do the monitoring – nobody agrees to this. - Storage, retention and access to recorded material must be handled in a way in which it can be submitted as evidence in a court of law. Comment: A storage and access procedure must be defined with the policy (this is valid for any CCTV solution other than a private home where content is not shared) - Limitation on the number of cameras per pole needs to be introduced. - Limitation on the positioning of cameras must be introduced taking account of privacy considerations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorThese are the Feedback from the Ward Committee Meetings and other related matters. They are lodged in Date order going backwards. Archives
May 2024
Categories |